CREATIVITY IS ALWAYS AHEAD OF ITS TIME

 

J Walter Christie was an inventor.

So he was a really creative person.

The difficulty with being truly creative is that you’re automatically ahead of your time.

You can see what the future is going to be.

All anyone else can see is what’s happening now.

So it’s very frustrating.

The future looks like a risk.

And if it doesn’t look like a risk, it must be because it looks like what’s happening now.

In which case it can’t be the future.

Because you can’t see the future from the past.

Henry Ford said “If I’d asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses”.

That’s what J. Walter Christie came up against.

In 1928 he invented a new kind of tank.

It was faster and lighter than anything else.

It was faster because it had large wheels which each had independent suspension.

This meant it could go over rough ground quicker than anything else.

It was lighter because it had sloping armour.

At that time all tanks had vertical armour.

Christie said with sloping armour the tank didn’t need so much, so it could be lighter.

It didn’t need so much because the angle of the slope would deflect shells better.

Also, anything sloping must be thicker measured on the horizontal.

So sloping armour would be more effective.

The tank would be lighter, faster, but better armoured than any other tank.

When he designed it in 1928, Christie called it the 1940 model.

Because he thought it would take everyone else 12 years to catch up.

He tried to sell his tank to the US Army.

But they refused to buy it.

They didn’t want fast, manoeuvrable tanks.

They saw tanks as slow-moving, mobile pillboxes to support the infantry.

The way they’d been used in the First World War.

Christie was furious.

He’d spent a fortune developing the tank.

He knew the next war would be fast and mobile.

He knew tanks would need to be fast and mobile.

If the US Army wouldn’t buy it, he’d sell it to someone who would.

The Russian army were very interested.

They thought Christie’s ideas about mobile warfare were right.

They bought two of his tanks and shipped them back to Russia.

There they tested them, took them apart, worked on them and developed them.

The Christie design eventually became the Russian T34.

At the beginning of World War Two the Germans unveiled Blitzkrieg.

Lightening war exactly as Christie had predicted it would be.

With fast, well armoured tanks that swept everything before them.

Meanwhile, with old-fashioned, slow, lumbering tanks everyone else crumbled.

The French, the British, even the Russians.

Until the Russians unveiled the T34.

The Germans had never seen anything like it and it stopped them dead.

It was faster than their tanks, over any terrain.

Thanks to the Christie suspension system.

And the German shells just bounced off the T34.

Thanks to Christie’s sloping armour.

The Panzers that had swept everything before them were stopped by the T34.

They didn’t know what to do.

Their weapons were no longer superior.

This was a step ahead of anything in the world.

And the T34 went on to be the best tank of the war by a long way.

In fact the T34 became the most successful tank of all time.

After the war the Americans realised tank warfare had changed.

They needed faster, better-armoured tanks, with independent suspension and sloping armour.

So, like everyone else, they started to copy the T34.

The Russian design that had come from Christie’s design.

The design they rejected twenty years earlier.

And that was the only thing J. Walter Christie got wrong.

His tank wasn’t 12 years ahead of everyone else’s thinking.

 

It was decades ahead.

 

 

 

13 Comments

  1. Is it possible not to be too ahead of its time?
    Christie was lucky because the Russians were keen.
    It’s great to be futuristic,
    but you don’t want to be too futuristic,
    otherwise noone understands you… yet.
    Not to be like Van Gogh.
    Surely you want them to get you while you’re still alive?
    Or am I in the wrong mindset?

    Irfan - 30 July 2012 8:38 am

  2. Irfan, of course you’re right.
    I’m sure we’d all choose to be just exactly the right amount ahead of our time, if we could.
    But we don’t always have the choice.
    It’s could to know that just because our work got rejected, doesn’t necessarily mean it was wrong.
    Maybe they just couldn’t see it.

    Dave Trott - 30 July 2012 8:52 am

  3. The second mouse gets the cheese.

    Jim - 30 July 2012 10:48 am

  4. Dave

    Did Christie make the Russians pay $75 billion for each tank because he knew they’d only be buying the 2.

    Or did he make the foolish error of expecting them to come back for 1000s more?

    Grilla Login - 30 July 2012 11:36 am

  5. Grilla,
    I didn’t say he was a good businessman.

    Dav Trott - 30 July 2012 2:18 pm

  6. Ha. As I thought.

    Grilla Login - 30 July 2012 2:52 pm

  7. Historians’ hain’t been able 2 pinpoint the exact moment the Cold War began, Dave.

    Until now:

    It was March 17, 1947. The American Ambassador to Moscow had invited his Soviet counterpart to a lavish party at the American embassy. At 20:06 a Soviet diplomatic attaché case sneezed on the Ferrero Rocher’s arranged in the shape of a pyramid on top of a coffee table.

    2 days later, the American Ambassador – who had close ties to President Truman – had watery eyes, a runny nose, and a score to settle.

    Grilla Login - 30 July 2012 4:13 pm

  8. ‘just because our work got rejected,
    doesn’t necessarily mean it was wrong.
    Maybe they just couldn’t see it.’

    Like this line a lot Dave,
    Made me more confident handling rejections.
    Thanks!

    Irfan - 31 July 2012 8:10 am

  9. Wasn’t it Tim D. who said: “Just because you won the argument doesn’t mean you are right.”

    Ciaran McCabe - 31 July 2012 9:18 am

  10. Hi Ciaran,
    Tim certainly said that to me about a client.
    “Just because they won the argument doesn’t make them right.”

    Dave Trott - 31 July 2012 10:05 am

  11. Some people can only see as far as the end of their nose.

    john p woods - 31 July 2012 9:25 pm

  12. Interesting Dave.
    I never knew of Christie.
    So was Sherman the original Christie tank?

    The T34 also succeeded because it had wider tracks preventing it from getting bogged down in the snow. At half the weight of a Nazi Tiger, it reigned supreme. Plus, as I think you mentioned in another blog, the Russians built several thousand of one tank so the parts could be swapped in a battlefield and replaced while German Technology failed in speed because of its complexity. Perhaps this was the true birthplace of mass production. That would make Communism the birthplace of Consumerism. How ironic.

    Kev - 10 August 2012 9:48 am

  13. Kev,
    In these pictures, The Sherman was based on the tank on the left, the T34 on the tank on the right.
    http://www.powmadeak47.com/tanky/christie.html
    The Sherman was so badly designed it had an aeroplane engine using high octane fuel, instead of diesel like the Russian and German tanks.
    This meant a single shell caused it to explode in flames.
    Which was why Germans called the Shermans “Tommy Cookers”.

    Dave Trott - 10 August 2012 10:23 am

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

back to top